In October, A Response to a Moron

Let's start with media coverage. You conflate two completely different issues. First of all, it is obvious to anyone who was paying attention that the media went HARD after Biden after the debate. He looked bad, and he sounded bad. That is inarguable, and it prompted the media to go into hyper-overdrive about his inability to "do the job." For weeks, until he resigned, we heard nothing but coverage of his frailty.  It was a feeding frenzy, and it had NOTHING to do with his standing in the polls. It was about his performance in the debate, period. To deny that they killed him over that is to deny reality.  

Meanwhile, for literally months on end, Trump has talked stupid, slurred words, been unable to stay on topic, made horrible comments about people, called parole names, had zero intelligent answers for ANY questions he has been asked (you don't get brownie points for taking questions you don't answer, Rich), brought forth NO policy positions ("I'm going to fix everything" is not policy), and generally acted like a buffoon. From the media: silence.

Now let's talk "softball questions." Guess you missed his town hall, Rich? That was normal behavior. Those were "tough" questions, huh? And then the dolt played music for 40 minutes. Did you see the Bloomberg interview, where he responded to virtually nothing? And when he did respond, he showed zero knowledge of finance and elicited embarrassing laughter from an educated audience. Again, he gets no points for going into "hostile territory" if his appearances there just suck. And they do. He is great in front of his morons because they are as dumb as he is, and he can just talk stupid so they can lap it up. Fools give him credit for "speaking the truth" or speaking his mind" when everything that comes out of his mouth is either dumb or hateful. That does not deserve credit. It deserves scorn. 

Now, Harris. If you think she can not talk intelligently or explain her positions and policies well, then I have to wonder about your ability to understand English. I wonder if you also think Obama is not intelligent, Rich. Do you? Harris is clearly intelligent, well-spoken, and knowledgeable, and she has a deep and strong resume, a huge step above. "I had a rich daddy." She has expressed her opinions and positions very clearly and succinctly, and her policies, both the whys and hows, are fully spelled out on her web page, which you surely have not read. She has changed positions on a few issues, but the orange moron was a Democrat for most of his miserable life, so I guess people change. It is frightening when people such as yourself are unable to differentiate intelligence from ignorance. It's disturbing. As an example, Vance speaks intelligently. I can recognize that. No argument there. He is a well-spoken monstrous, dangerous liar.

As for Howard Stern, he has always been one of the best interviewers out there, whether you like him or not. I did not see the Harris interview, but I've heard him interview many people over the course of his career, and he is very good at it no matter what you think. I can not comment specifically on the Harris interview as I did not see it.

Now, let's talk immigration and her Fox answers. Point #1, remind me how long she has been President, Rich? Because if you can answer that one, then you can tell me what policies she set. You want answers on Biden's policies? Ask Biden. Veeps do not set policy. 

On the immigration bill, that is utter bullsh!t. You can debate the merits of that bill until you're blue in the face. But it was a bipartisan effort written by Republicans that had a 100% chance of passing. It was not perfect, but it was, according to both sides, a massive step forward. Your boy did NOT kill it because it was a bad bill. He killed it for solely political reasons. He stopped a bill that would have helped the immigration situation to help his election chances. You spin that any farking way you want and it still comes up wrong, pal. So your criticism of the bill is disingenuous at best, sheer ignorance at worst. 

Oh, and let's be clear: the border policies that Biden removed were stopped because they EXPIRED.  Trump used the COVID crises to close the border. Once the crisis passed, those rules simply became illegal. Get your facts straight, man. Closing the border in any meaningful way requires legislation, not executive actions.  Trump had four years to get that done. Please show me what legislation he got passed. The answer is "none."

Your NATO argument is also a complete falsehoods. Trump negotiated no such thing, and you are simply parroting what you've heard on Fox News. The U.S. was never stiffed for unpaid NATO bills. It's utter bullsh!t and you can look it up. None of what he says about NATO is true. 

Now Afghanistan. More bullsh!t. Trump and Trump alone negotiated the Afghanistan withdrawal. He pulled large numbers of troops and resources out and left the remaining forces there without the ability to execute a safe exit. And he KNEW it but doesn't care because he knew Biden would take the blame for it.  Biden had to abide by the terms Trump negotiated with the Taliban. That mess belongs on his shoulders. Period. 

As for the rest, she has limited time to talk about much of anything on the campaign trail. If you really cared about her positions, you would read what's on her website. But you don't care, and you won't read them.  It's easier to complain, right?

The educational stuff I mostly agree with. If we don't do something about the cost of college and change our thinking there, we will be left with a society of people who do not understand civics nor how the government works.

They'll be just like Trump.